Cited by 119Effects of Radiation ExposureSpaceflight effects on biologyRadiation Therapy and Dosimetry

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Chromosome Aberrations in the Blood Lymphocytes of Astronauts after Space Flight

Abstract

Cytogenetic analysis of the lymphocytes of astronauts provides a direct measurement of space radiation damage in vivo, which takes into account individual radiosensitivity and considers the influence of microgravity and other stress conditions. Chromosome exchanges were measured in the blood lymphocytes of eight crew members after their respective space missions, using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with chromosome painting probes. Significant increases in aberrations were observed after the long-duration missions. The in vivo dose was derived from the frequencies of translocations and total exchanges using calibration curves determined before flight, and the RBE was estimated by comparison with individually measured physical absorbed doses. The values for average RBE were compared to the average quality factor (Q) from direct measurements of the lineal energy spectra using a tissue-equivalent proportional counter (TEPC) and radiation transport codes. The ratio of aberrations identified as complex was slightly higher after flight, which is thought to be an indication of exposure to high-LET radiation. To determine whether the frequency of complex aberrations measured in metaphase spreads after exposure to high-LET radiation was influenced by a cell cycle delay, chromosome damage was analyzed in prematurely condensed chromosome samples collected from two crew members before and after a short-duration mission. The frequency of complex exchanges after flight was higher in prematurely condensed chromosomes than in metaphase cells for one crew member.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1667/0033-7587(2001)156[0731:caitbl]2.0.co;2

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 36 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 119

Metadata

Authors
George, K., Durante, M., Wu, H., Willingham, V., Badhwar, G., & Cucinotta, F. A.
Affiliations
  • Kelsey-Seybold Clinic (US)
  • University of Naples Federico II (IT)
  • Johnson Space Center (US)
Corresponding author
George, K.
Venue
Radiation Research
Published
2001-12
Volume
156
Issue
6
Pages
731-738
ISSN
  • 0033-7587 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-5404
OpenAlex
W2176945815
Cited by
119
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
6.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Radiation Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Effects of Radiation Exposure
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Spaceflight effects on biology
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
Keywords
space radiation, astronaut health, blood lymphocytes, chromosomal abnormalities, chromosomal translocation, radiation quality factor, relative biological effectiveness, high-LET radiation, microgravity, cell cycle delay, premature chromosome condensation, long-duration spaceflight
MeSH terms
Chromosome Aberrations, Cosmic Radiation, Humans, Lymphocytes, Space Flight

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review